In The Loop
Sign Up
Log In
Upgrade
Search
Home
BIS
DDTC
In The Loop
Mar 16, 2025
EAR "Know Your Customer" Guidance Updates and Red Flags
EAR "Know Your Customer" Guidance Updates and Red Flags
00:00
28:09
Transcript
0:00
All right, diving right in today, we're taking a close look at some, well, some pretty significant changes in the world of export controls. Yeah, definitely significant.
0:08
Specifically, uh, we're digging into the updates laid out in Supplement number three to Part seven thirty-two of the E... you know, the Export Administration Regulations. Right. Right.
0:19
So if you're involved in international trade in any way, shape, or form, this is something you really need to be aware of. And don't worry, we're not gonna get bogged down in all the legal mumbo jumbo.
0:27
No, no, not at all.
0:29
Our goal here is to really cut through the noise and give you the practical insights you need to understand how these updates might impact your business or your field, however you're connected to this world. Absolutely.
0:40
That's the key takeaway here. Now, this particular update puts a big emphasis on what they call know your customer guidance, and it introduces a whole bunch of red flags,
0:51
you know, those warning signs that every exporter needs to be on the lookout for. Yeah. It's all about due diligence, really sharpening that focus.
0:59
So consider this your crash course on these evolving rules, your guide to spotting potential pitfalls, and most importantly, making sure you're staying on the right side of compliance.
1:11
Couldn't have said it better myself. It's about empowering exporters, giving them the tools they need. Okay, so let's jump right into this know your customer guidance. Yeah.
1:20
What does it actually mean in a practical sense for someone, you know, like our listener, who's out there dealing with exports on a day-to-day basis?
1:27
Well, at its heart, this guidance clarifies the responsibilities you already have, right? Yeah.
1:32
It's about understanding where your products are ultimately ending up, who's actually using them, and what they're being used for. Right. The end use, the end user- Yeah... the whole picture. Exactly.
1:41
And it's important to remember, and the document itself makes this clear, this isn't about creating a whole new set of rules. It's not reinventing the wheel, so to speak. Precisely.
1:50
It's more about providing clearer guidelines on what it means to operate with real awareness in these international transactions. So it's not like if everything seems okay on the surface,
2:01
I suddenly need to become a private investigator- [laughs]... digging into every single customer's background, right? No. No, not at all.
2:07
The basic principle is this: if there aren't any red flags, any of those warning signs that something might be off, you can generally rely on the information your customer provides.
2:17
You don't have to constantly second-guess every detail of a normal, routine transaction. Okay, that makes sense. You don't need to be suspicious of everyone right off the bat.
2:27
But what happens when those red flags, those warning signs do pop up? What changes then? Ah, that's the crucial point, the turning point.
2:35
When you spot those suspicious indicators, that's when the duty to inquire kicks in. You can't just sweep them under the rug. Absolutely not.
2:42
And this isn't just about license exceptions, you know, the ones that mention know or reason to know. This has much broader implications touching the whole export control framework.
2:53
Even when you're applying for an export license, you're expected to be providing accurate, truthful information, and these red flags should prompt you to dig deeper to verify the details you've been given.
3:03
So even if you're going through the formal licensing process, those red flags still matter. You can't just assume everything's fine because you're going through the motions. Exactly.
3:11
It's about taking responsibility, doing your due diligence, regardless of the specific process. Now, there's this term self-blinding, which sounds pretty serious. What's the gist of that concept?
3:23
It's a really key aspect of these regulations. Mm-hmm. Self-blinding is basically deliberately avoiding information that could reveal a problematic end use or end user.
3:33
So intentionally staying in the dark, even when there are signs that something might be wrong. Precisely.
3:39
Like for example, telling your sales team, "Hey, don't ask customers about the final destination or the intended use of the product." You know, trying to create this artificial wall of ignorance.
3:49
Trying to plead ignorance later on if things go south. Yeah, but the regulations are very clear on this. Intentionally shielding yourself from knowledge won't protect you from liability.
3:59
It can actually backfire, make things worse. Exactly. In fact, actively trying to remain unaware could actually be seen as an aggravating factor in any enforcement proceedings.
4:09
This really highlights the importance of having a solid export compliance program in place within your organization. So it's not enough to just avoid asking certain questions.
4:19
You need to have systems in place that ensure the right information is flowing within the company, that potential red flags are being identified and addressed. Right.
4:28
It's about creating a culture of compliance, a proactive approach. Now, speaking of internal matters- Mm-hmm...
4:34
if one of my employees, you know, someone working for me, becomes aware of something concerning, something that raises a red flag, does that knowledge get attributed to the company as a whole? Absolutely.
4:45
The guidance is very clear on that. Knowledge held by an employee is considered knowledge held by the company. So it's not like you could say, "Oh, that was just one rogue employee. We didn't know what they were doing."
4:54
Nope, no such luck. That's why having clear internal policies and robust compliance procedures is so vital. So everyone's on the same page. Everyone understands their responsibilities. Exactly.
5:05
These systems need to ensure that any potential red flags an employee spots are reported up the chain, you know, escalated to senior officials who can actually make informed decisions about the transaction.
5:17
So it's not just about, uh, identifying red flags. It's about having a process for dealing with them, for escalating them to the right people. Absolutely.
5:25
Because not having those processes in place, well, that could even be seen as a form of organizational self-blinding. Right. Like the company as a whole is intentionally turning a blind eye. Yeah.
5:36
So okay, let's say a red flag does pop up. An employee brings it to the attention of the right people. What's the immediate next step? What should an exporter do in that situation?
5:46
Well, the first thing you've gotta do is inquire, right? You need to actively seek more information about what triggered that red flag in the first place. Dig a little deeper, get some context. Exactly.
5:57
Then once you've gathered some more information, you have to reevaluate everything.
6:00
You look at all the details you have, including what you learned through your inquiry, and you try to determine whether those initial red flags can be reasonably explained.
6:08
So is there a legitimate reason for this seemingly suspicious activity? Right. If there is, and you're satisfied with the explanation, then you might be able to proceed with the transaction.
6:19
However, if those concerns remain, if you're still not comfortable, and you decide to move forward anyway- You're taking a big risk... you are.
6:27
You're exposing yourself to the risk of being found to have had knowledge, in the legal sense, that a violation was likely to occur. And that can have some serious consequences, right? We'll get into those a bit later.
6:39
But first, what if I, as the exporter, can't get a satisfactory explanation, or my gut feeling is telling me something's still not right?
6:48
What's the best course of action then?In that situation, the guidance is pretty clear-cut.
6:52
You should either stop the transaction completely, halt it in its tracks, or you need to disclose all the relevant information to the Bureau of Industry and Security, BIS.
7:02
So either back out completely or go to the authorities and lay out all your concerns. Exactly. And that disclosure can be done through a license application or whatever format BIS specifies.
7:13
But the bottom line is, it's always better to err on the side of caution. When you've got unresolved concerns about a potential export, reaching out to BIS for guidance is always the more prudent approach.
7:25
It's better to be safe than sorry, especially when you're dealing with something as potentially sensitive as export controls. So we've talked about the general process of identifying and responding to red flags.
7:38
Now let's get into some specifics. The document provides a whole laundry list of these red flags.
7:43
Can we walk through some of the most common or illustrative examples and really understand why each one should raise a red flag in the context of export controls? You know, what's the underlying concern behind each one?
7:53
Absolutely. Let's do that. It's important to really understand the why behind these red flags. Okay, so let's start with a pretty straightforward one.
8:00
The customer or purchasing agent is reluctant to offer information about the end use of a product. Why is that a red flag? Well, the basic concern here is a lack of transparency.
8:11
Legitimate customers, businesses operating above board, they're usually pretty open about what they're planning to do with the goods they're buying. They're not trying to hide anything. Exactly.
8:20
So when a customer is hesitant to share that basic information, it often signals that they're trying to circumvent controls, maybe hide the true end user or the real purpose of the goods, which might be restricted.
8:34
So it's not necessarily that they're doing something wrong, but the lack of transparency itself is a warning sign. It definitely raises a red flag. It's like one of the fundamental principles of export compliance.
8:46
Transparency is key. When it's missing, you need to be extra cautious. Okay, that makes sense. What about this one? The product's capabilities do not fit the buyer's line of business.
8:55
For example, a small bakery places an order for several sophisticated lasers. I mean, that's pretty suspicious on its face. It is. It's like, why would a small bakery need high-powered lasers? It just doesn't add up.
9:07
What are they baking, laser beams? Right.
9:09
This kind of illogical transaction raises the suspicion that the buyer might not be the actual end user or that the lasers are meant for something completely different, something that might be restricted.
9:21
So it's about looking at the bigger picture, seeing if all the pieces fit together logically. Exactly. You're looking for consistency, for a plausible explanation. Oh, here's another one.
9:30
The product ordered is incompatible with the technical level of the country to which the product is being shipped.
9:36
For example, ordering highly specialized semiconductor manufacturing equipment for a country with virtually no electronics industry. That's a big red flag.
9:46
Why would a country with no real electronics infrastructure need that kind of advanced equipment? Yeah. It makes you wonder if that's really the final destination. Exactly.
9:54
It raises the concern that the stated destination is just a transit point, and the equipment is actually headed somewhere else, somewhere it's not supposed to go. Okay, how about this?
10:03
The customer has little or no business background. What's the issue there? Well, that can be a red flag because it makes you question the legitimacy of the buyer.
10:12
Are they even a real business, or is this some kind of front? That's the question.
10:17
A lack of a track record can be a sign of a shell company, you know, a fake company created to hide the true end user or the final destination.
10:25
So it's about verifying that you're dealing with a legitimate entity, someone who's actually capable of handling the transaction. Exactly.
10:32
You wanna make sure they have the financial capacity, the technical know-how, all that. Okay, here's another one. The customer is willing to pitch cash for a very expensive item when the terms of sale call for financing.
10:47
That seems odd. Why would that be a red flag? Yeah, unusual payment terms like that, especially a large cash payment when financing is the norm, can be a sign of something fishy going on.
10:57
Like maybe they're trying to avoid a paper trail? Could be. It might indicate that they're using illicit funds or trying to bypass the usual financial channels, which provide more transparency.
11:07
So it's not just about the product itself. It's about the whole financial side of the transaction. Right. All the pieces have to fit together. Okay, how about this one?
11:16
The customer is unfamiliar with the product's performance characteristics but still wants the product. That's another one that raises eyebrows.
11:24
A legitimate end user, someone who's actually gonna use the product, they usually have a good understanding of what it does, how it works. They've done the research. They know what they need. Right.
11:33
So if someone's eager to buy a product but doesn't seem to know the basics about it, it might be a sign that they're acting on behalf of someone else, someone who wants to stay hidden.
11:43
Like a middleman for a more secretive buyer. Exactly. Or it could be that the product is intended for some unknown, possibly illicit purpose that even the direct buyer isn't aware of. Okay, that makes sense.
11:54
Here's another one. Routine installation, training, or maintenance services are declined by the customer. That's definitely unusual.
12:02
Especially for complex or specialized equipment, you'd expect the buyer to want those services. To make sure they can use the product properly. Right.
12:09
So when a customer refuses those standard post-sale services, it suggests that they're trying to limit the supplier's involvement, you know, once the product is out of their hands.
12:19
Like they don't want anyone snooping around, seeing how they're using it. Exactly.
12:22
It could mean they're planning to use the product in a way the supplier wouldn't approve of or maybe in a location that's subject to export restrictions.
12:31
So it's another sign of potential diversion, trying to hide the true end use or destination. Right. The lack of transparency is the key takeaway here. Okay, how about this?
12:41
Delivery dates are vague, or deliveries are planned for out-of-the-way destinations.What's the concern there?
12:47
Well, vague delivery schedules or shipments to obscure locations, those can be tactics used to conceal the real destination of the goods. Make it harder to track where they're really going. Precisely.
12:59
Legitimate businesses usually have pretty clear logistical requirements. You know, they need things delivered by a certain date to a specific place. They're not being evasive about the details. Exactly.
13:09
So when things are vague or unusual, it raises suspicion. Okay, here's a more direct one. A freight forwarding firm is listed as the product's final destination. Why is that a red flag?
13:20
Well, using a freight forwarder is pretty normal in international shipping, but listing them as the final destination without any information about the actual end user or the country of use, that's a big problem.
13:32
It's like trying to hide the real recipient behind a middleman. Exactly. It strongly suggests that they're trying to mask the true destination of the goods.
13:41
Okay, and kind of related to that, the shipping route is abnormal for the product and destination. How does an unusual route raise a red flag?
13:50
Well, an illogical or roundabout shipping route can be a clear indication of diversion.
13:55
They might be routing the product through multiple countries to obscure its final destination, you know, to try to avoid export controls or sanctions that would apply if it was shipped directly.
14:04
So they're trying to sneak it through the back door, so to speak. In a way, yeah. It's all about making the transaction harder to trace, harder to scrutinize. Okay, this one's interesting.
14:13
Packaging is inconsistent with the stated method of shipment or destination. How would that raise a red flag?
14:20
Well, for example, if you have bulky industrial equipment, you know, something that's heavily crated, being shipped by air cargo. That doesn't sound right. It's not.
14:30
It suggests that it's not going to a typical end user who would have the facilities to handle that kind of cargo. It's a way of misrepresenting the nature of the goods or their destination.
14:41
Like trying to disguise something bulky as something smaller and more innocuous. Exactly. It's another tactic to try to slip something through the cracks. Okay, here's a pretty straightforward one.
14:51
When questioned, the buyer is evasive or unclear about whether the purchased product is for domestic use, export, or re-export. Yeah, that's a clear sign that something's not right.
15:01
Transparency about the intended use and final destination is fundamental to export compliance. You need to know where your products are going and what they're being used for. Absolutely.
15:10
So when a buyer gives evasive or unclear answers to those basic questions, it raises concerns that they might be planning to export or re-export the items illegally.
15:20
Okay, now let's get into some more specific examples related to controlled parts and components. What about this red flag?
15:27
The customer places an order for an unusually large quantity of parts or components for controlled end items, particularly when there's reason to believe the destination country has very few of those end items in operation.
15:40
That's a major red flag, especially when you're dealing with items classified under the nine by five-fifteen or six hundred series categories in the OR. Those are some pretty sensitive categories, right? They are.
15:51
Those cover military and dual use items. So if a customer orders, say, enough spare parts to service a hundred fighter jets, but you know the entire country only has two of those jets. Something doesn't add up. Exactly.
16:03
It strongly suggests that those parts are not meant for legitimate repairs or maintenance. They might be trying to build new end items without authorization.
16:11
Right, or maybe re-export those parts to a prohibited destination. Okay, and here's a red flag that directly relates to that concern.
16:18
The customer indicates or the facts suggest that a nine by five-fifteen or six hundred series item may be re-exported to a destination listed in country group D.5.
16:29
What's the significance of that particular country group? Country group D.5 includes countries that pose significant national security concerns for the US. So places we don't want those sensitive items ending up.
16:39
Exactly. Any indication that those controlled items might be diverted to those specific destinations triggers a high level of scrutiny. It's a major red flag because of the potential impact on national security.
16:51
Precisely. Okay. We're also seeing several red flags that specifically relate to advanced technology, particularly in the semiconductor industry. Here's one.
17:00
The customer's website or other marketing materials prior to October seventh, twenty twenty-two indicated that the company had advertised or otherwise indicated its capability for developing or producing advanced-node integrated circuits.
17:12
Why is past activity relevant here? This red flag is all about historical intent and capabilities.
17:18
Even if a company has scrubbed their website or marketing materials, those past indications that they were involved in developing or producing advanced integrated circuits, well, that raises concerns.
17:30
So even if they're not openly advertising it anymore, that past involvement is still a red flag. It is.
17:36
It suggests that their current or future purchases might still be tied to those activities, which are subject to very strict export controls because of their potential military applications.
17:47
Right, because those advanced chips can be used in all sorts of sensitive technologies. Exactly.
17:51
Okay, what if a customer explicitly states that they won't use the items they're ordering for advanced integrated circuit development or production, but the specific items they're requesting are almost exclusively used for that very purpose?
18:05
That kind of direct contradiction between what they're saying and what they're doing is a huge red flag. It's like they're saying one thing, but their actions are telling a different story. Precisely.
18:15
It suggests that their claims about the intended end use might not be truthful, and that the items are actually destined for those restricted activities. So you can't just take their word for it.
18:25
You have to look at the whole picture. Exactly. Here's a more specific one related to end users.
18:31
The customer is known to develop or produce items for companies located in Macau or a destination specified in country group D.5 that are involved with supercomputers. What's the concern there?
18:44
Well, if you have information that directly links your customer to entities in Macau or country group D.5 that are involved in supercomputer development or production, that's a big problem.
18:54
Because our exports could end up contributing to those restricted activities. Exactly. Even if your direct customer claims they're using the items for something else, those connections raise serious concerns.
19:04
It's about understanding the whole network, the web of connections. Right.
19:08
What if I, as the exporter, have direct knowledgeThat a customer intends to develop restricted supercomputers or advanced integrated circuits in the future, even if they're not doing so currently.
19:19
That future intent, if you have solid knowledge of it, that's also a red flag. So it's not just about what they're doing now, it's about what they're planning to do. Right.
19:26
The export control regulations, specifically section seven forty-four point two three AI or A two I of the EAR, they're designed to prevent the development of those sensitive technologies.
19:38
So if you know your customer has concrete plans to engage in those activities, you have a duty to inquire and potentially stop the transaction altogether.
19:47
So you can't just turn a blind eye to future intentions, especially when you have concrete knowledge. Absolutely not. Okay. This next red flag is quite detailed and technical.
19:56
The exporter has knowledge that it is or seeks to be producing at a facility where production of advanced node ICs occur.
20:03
For a company headquartered in either Macau or a destination specified in country group D point five, an integrated circuit or a computer, electronic assembly, or component that will incorporate, A, more than fifty billion transistors and, B, high bandwidth memory, HBM.
20:18
Mm-hmm. It's very specific. It is. It's targeting situations where you, the exporter, are aware that you're supplying to or involved in manufacturing at a facility that's producing advanced integrated circuits.
20:30
And this production is linked to companies in Macau or country group D point five, and the products they're making will exceed certain performance thresholds.
20:39
So it's about the exporter's knowledge of the whole manufacturing process and the final product. Exactly.
20:45
And that level of knowledge triggers a need for very careful scrutiny, and it will likely require an export license. So you can't just plead ignorance in that situation. No, not at all.
20:54
What if a fabrication facility that's not known for advanced node IC production starts ordering equipment that's clearly designed for that kind of advanced manufacturing?
21:04
That mismatch between their current capabilities and the equipment they're ordering, that's a strong indicator that they might be planning to upgrade their operations to start producing those advanced chips.
21:13
So it's about anticipating future activities based on their current behavior. Exactly, and that potential future end use, well, it has to be carefully evaluated under the relevant export control regulations.
21:25
Okay, we're also seeing several red flags that revolve around uncertainty about the ultimate end user or the final destination.
21:33
For instance, shipping sophisticated IC development equipment to a distributor who has no manufacturing operations themselves. Right.
21:40
That's suspicious because that kind of equipment is usually customized, and it requires specific installation and support from the supplier.
21:46
So it doesn't make sense to send it to a distributor who's not gonna be the one using it. Exactly. It creates a lot of uncertainty about who's really gonna benefit from that equipment and what their intentions are.
21:57
Here's a red flag related to the past history of an item. Uncertainty about whether a required export or re-export license was actually obtained for a particular item in the past.
22:08
Why is that a concern for future transactions?
22:10
If you have reason to believe that a necessary license wasn't obtained previously, or that a current or future transaction involving that item would require a license that would likely be denied, you're in dangerous territory.
22:23
So even if you weren't the one who exported it originally, you could still be held liable. Exactly.
22:29
If you provide services or upgrades for that item, knowing that it might have been exported illegally in the past, you could be violating the EAR.
22:38
It's about doing your due diligence, understanding the history of the items you're dealing with. Absolutely.
22:43
What if I'm asked to service, install, or upgrade equipment that appears to have been altered after it was initially exported- Yeah...
22:50
in a way that suggests it's now being used for a more advanced end use that would have required a license originally? It's a huge red flag.
22:59
It suggests that the equipment is now being used in a way that wasn't authorized, and providing services or upgrades without addressing that new end use could get you in a lot of trouble.
23:08
So you can't just blindly perform those services. Uh-uh. You need to understand how the equipment is being used. Right.
23:14
We're also seeing red flags that connect new customers with entities that are already on the US entity list, which, for our listeners who might not be familiar, is a list of parties that are considered a risk to US national security or foreign policy interests.
23:28
Right. So if a new customer has significant overlap in their management or technical personnel with a company that's already on the entity list, that's a cause for concern.
23:39
Like they might just be a front for the same restricted activity. Exactly. And similarly, if a new customer requests items that were specifically designed for an entity on the entity list, that's also suspicious.
23:49
Like they're trying to take over those restricted operations. Right.
23:53
There's also a specific red flag concerning foreign-produced items that contain integrated circuits and their potential connection to the foreign direct product rules, the FDP rules, related to entity list and SME designations.
24:07
Can you explain that a bit more? Sure.
24:09
Basically, if you're dealing with a foreign-produced item that falls under certain categories and contains at least one integrated circuit, you need to be very careful about the FDP rules.
24:19
So those rules might apply even though the item wasn't made in the US. Exactly. You have to determine whether your foreign-made items meet the criteria outlined in those FDP rules before you can proceed.
24:29
Okay, what about a customer whose physical facility is directly connected to a facility known for advanced node IC production?
24:37
That physical connection, like a shared pathway or infrastructure, strongly suggests that the customer's facility might also be involved in or supporting that advanced chip production.
24:47
So they might be subject to the same export controls even if they're claiming to be doing something else. Right.
24:54
The only exception is if BIS has issued an advisory opinion that clarifies the technology node of the facility, which could give you grounds to think otherwise.
25:03
Okay, so it's important to check for those advisory opinions. Absolutely. Finally, there's a red flag concerning the provision of cloud computing services for training advanced artificial intelligence models.
25:13
Can you explain that one? Yeah.
25:15
If you're providing services that could be used to train very powerful AI models, specifically those meeting the criteria of ECCN four E zero nine one, to entities in certain restricted countries, you need to be extremely careful.
25:28
Because those trained AI models could be considered exports themselves.
25:32
Exactly, and if those exports are going to restricted destinations without the proper licenses, you could be held liable for aiding and abetting a violation.
25:41
So as a cloud provider, you have a responsibility to understand where those AI models are going and what they'll be used for. Absolutely.
25:48
Wow, that was a very thorough overview of those red flags.It's clear that this is not just a superficial checklist. Each one points to a real risk of violating export control regulations.
26:00
It really emphasizes the need for constant vigilance in international transactions. I completely agree. And it's important to remember that this list, while extensive, is not exhaustive.
26:10
There might be other red flags that pop up depending on the specific situation. Exactly. These are just examples to help you understand the general principles of know your customer due diligence.
26:19
The key takeaway is to always be cautious, do your research, ask questions, and don't ignore your gut feeling if something seems off. So we've discussed how to identify red flags and what to do when they appear.
26:31
But what are the potential consequences if an exporter chooses to ignore those warnings and proceeds with a transaction despite the presence of unresolved red flags? The consequences can be very serious.
26:42
You could face hefty fines, suspension or revocation of your export privileges, and in some cases, even criminal charges. So it's not something to be taken lightly. Absolutely not.
26:52
BIS takes export control violations very seriously, and they actively work with industry to prevent them.
26:59
If you willfully ignore those red flags, it shows a lack of due care, which could be interpreted as a deliberate violation. And beyond the legal consequences, there's the reputational damage to consider.
27:10
Right, that can be just as devastating. So to sum up this deep dive, the main takeaway is that understanding and addressing these red flags is absolutely crucial for staying compliant with export control regulations.
27:20
I couldn't agree more. These recent changes really highlight the importance of ongoing vigilance and proactive inquiry in every international transaction.
27:29
It's all about being aware, being informed, and taking the necessary steps to ensure responsible global trade. And on that note, we encourage all our listeners to take some time to review the full text of Supplement No.
27:43
Three to Part seven thirty-two themselves. It's a valuable resource for anyone involved in exporting. Absolutely. It's essential reading for staying up to date on these evolving regulations.
27:52
And as a final thought for our listeners, considering everything we've discussed today, what new procedures or internal reviews might your organization benefit from implementing to strengthen your export compliance efforts moving forward?
28:05
It's a question worth pondering. Thanks for joining us for this important discussion. Thanks for having me.
In The Loop
Recent episodes
They're Hiring 290 Agents and They're Coming for You
May 13, 2026
Export Compliance Enforcement Surge in 2026
May 12, 2026
In The Loop: What counts as an export?
May 4, 2026
In The Loop: Files can be exports too
May 4, 2026
Illegal Tech Export Attempt to China: Bohmerwald
Mar 27, 2025
Haas Automation $2.5M Sanctions Settlement
Jan 26, 2025
Curbing China's Semiconductor Advancement
Jan 26, 2025
Refinements to Controls for Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing
Dec 9, 2024
Ontario Man Arrested for Exporting Military Items to North Korea
Dec 9, 2024
December Additions and Modifications to the Entity List
Dec 9, 2024
